<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study of Episiotomy and Tearing in Future Births</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future</link>
	<description>Daily dose of women's health news and media analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future/comment-page-1#comment-501</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourbodies.s467.sureserver.com/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future-births#comment-501</guid>
		<description>Thanks to both of you for your insights. I was genuinely surprised that the rate would still be so high, but I can definitely see how people continuing to practice how they were taught decades ago might keep rates up. That&#039;s a tricky one for patients, I think, who might be more inclined to trust an older, more experienced physician than a younger/newer resident.

Labor Nurse, maybe we don&#039;t need more studies, we just need people to actually read them! :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to both of you for your insights. I was genuinely surprised that the rate would still be so high, but I can definitely see how people continuing to practice how they were taught decades ago might keep rates up. That&#8217;s a tricky one for patients, I think, who might be more inclined to trust an older, more experienced physician than a younger/newer resident.</p>
<p>Labor Nurse, maybe we don&#8217;t need more studies, we just need people to actually read them! <img src='http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Labor Nurse</title>
		<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future/comment-page-1#comment-500</link>
		<dc:creator>Labor Nurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourbodies.s467.sureserver.com/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future-births#comment-500</guid>
		<description>I agree with Hilary. I have seen this first hand.  The residents I work with are great; a great group of evidenced based doctors of our future.  On the other hand, a local community hospital where the majority of the MDs are over 50 and male practice old school OB.  Episiotomies on all primips, automatic c/s for suspected large babies, pitocin galore....you name it.  One doc supposedly has a 75% c/s rate...I don&#039;t have actually proof of this, but my source is very trustworthy and would have first hand knowledge of this.  I find this absolutely insane.

I read this article just recently and my first response was, &quot;Duh...scar tissue isn&#039;t as elastic as normal tissue&quot; while my second thought was &quot;How much more documentation of how the risks outweigh the benefits of episiotomies do we need?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Hilary. I have seen this first hand.  The residents I work with are great; a great group of evidenced based doctors of our future.  On the other hand, a local community hospital where the majority of the MDs are over 50 and male practice old school OB.  Episiotomies on all primips, automatic c/s for suspected large babies, pitocin galore&#8230;.you name it.  One doc supposedly has a 75% c/s rate&#8230;I don&#8217;t have actually proof of this, but my source is very trustworthy and would have first hand knowledge of this.  I find this absolutely insane.</p>
<p>I read this article just recently and my first response was, &#8220;Duh&#8230;scar tissue isn&#8217;t as elastic as normal tissue&#8221; while my second thought was &#8220;How much more documentation of how the risks outweigh the benefits of episiotomies do we need?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future/comment-page-1#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ourbodies.s467.sureserver.com/blog/2008/06/new-study-of-episiotomy-and-tearing-in-future-births#comment-499</guid>
		<description>I would like to think that this indicates that residents, who would be more likely to be delivering women who are not being seen by a private practice doctor, are being trained in an evidence based manner. I have heard that OBs, especially OBs that have been practicing for more than a decade or so, are not very likely to do evidence based medicine, and are more likely to do it the way they were shown years ago.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to think that this indicates that residents, who would be more likely to be delivering women who are not being seen by a private practice doctor, are being trained in an evidence based manner. I have heard that OBs, especially OBs that have been practicing for more than a decade or so, are not very likely to do evidence based medicine, and are more likely to do it the way they were shown years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

