<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political Diagnosis: Senate Finance Committee Considers Health Care Reform Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2009/09/senate-finance-committee-considers-health-care-reform-bill/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2009/09/senate-finance-committee-considers-health-care-reform-bill</link>
	<description>Daily dose of women's health news and media analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:46:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/blog/2009/09/senate-finance-committee-considers-health-care-reform-bill/comment-page-1#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ourbodiesourblog.org/?p=8989#comment-2767</guid>
		<description>Everyone is talking about the crazy right-wing anger out there -- and how it is making it impossible to have a rational discussion -- let alone legislation on health care.

But what people aren&#039;t talking about is how the Democrats unwittingly stoke the fire at every turn.

Abortion funding is a classic case study.  Democrats -- even those clearly sympathetic to women&#039;s concerns, like Rockefeller and Obama -- refuse to articulate why including abortion funding is a simple matter of equity.  In fact, they run away from a debate over it -- often in an overdetermined fashion (thanks, Christine, for emphasizing the emphasis -- that&#039;s amazing).

How are we supposed to have a rational discussion -- as opposed to shout-downs at town halls -- if the potential leaders of that rational discussion  abdicate their roles?  Is it any surprise that reactionary forces come in to fill the void?

And don&#039;t talk to me about the media as the problem.  Sure, 24-hour news channels are pretty scary places, but as evidence by his media blitz the last couple of days, Obama and others can find a space for their message if they are willing to put it out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone is talking about the crazy right-wing anger out there &#8212; and how it is making it impossible to have a rational discussion &#8212; let alone legislation on health care.</p>
<p>But what people aren&#8217;t talking about is how the Democrats unwittingly stoke the fire at every turn.</p>
<p>Abortion funding is a classic case study.  Democrats &#8212; even those clearly sympathetic to women&#8217;s concerns, like Rockefeller and Obama &#8212; refuse to articulate why including abortion funding is a simple matter of equity.  In fact, they run away from a debate over it &#8212; often in an overdetermined fashion (thanks, Christine, for emphasizing the emphasis &#8212; that&#8217;s amazing).</p>
<p>How are we supposed to have a rational discussion &#8212; as opposed to shout-downs at town halls &#8212; if the potential leaders of that rational discussion  abdicate their roles?  Is it any surprise that reactionary forces come in to fill the void?</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t talk to me about the media as the problem.  Sure, 24-hour news channels are pretty scary places, but as evidence by his media blitz the last couple of days, Obama and others can find a space for their message if they are willing to put it out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

